Saturday, April 23, 2011

The Temporary Farewell

Dear People,

 

I feel like I’ve been at war for much longer than what most are aware of, then maybe I’m aware of. Most of my life I have had to switch uniforms, having the curse and blessing to become the comrades of many armies, or playing on different teams, having the opportunity to meet a variety of people. Yet my allegiance to the war against intolerance, poverty, abuse of human rights, and the abuse of Earth’s natural resources never yields. I have been blessed to have had lots of success with my current uniform, my current army, the California Conservation Corps. 

The trail that leads to legendary success is treacherous, because no such trails exist. These are made solely by the individual that chooses to make such a  trail. On April 24th 2011, I, along with a few of my fellow current comrades, have been selected to embark on another journey into the backcountry of some of the United States of America’s most beautiful national parks. We will have no electronics, or communication with the outside world except by mail in which I have written the address below this message. I will be headed to Kings Canyon National Park, led by a man name David Villarino. When I was locked up years back, an OG once told me: “When you’re in here, all the days are the same, except for your first and your last.” But this new experience isn’t jail. This will be liberation. I’m looking forward making lasting friendships, as I feel I have with the California Conservation Corps that spans beyond any temporary uniform. Another man once told me if I plan to attempt to carry the world on my back, make sure you stretch. I stretch every day. We stretch every day. There is a lot of work to be done, and when I return, I hope that I am an even better person, and I can contribute even more to society.  

The King returns September 28, 2011.

Jason Evans

 

Jason Evans
Attn: CCC Trail Crew,
P.O. Box 928 Kings Canyon, CA 93633
United States of America

 

 

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous

Friday, April 15, 2011

Showtime

Showtime. No turning back. Sometimes we must reside temporarily in the darkness, only to step into the light when the time is right. But how does one know when, the clock you were given at birth is faceless?

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Che

‎"No creo que seamos parientes muy cercanos, pero si usted es capaz de temblar de indignación cada vez que se comete una injusticia en el mundo, somos compañeros, que es más importante." -Che

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

PRACTICAL TRAVELER; The 'Pack' Of Backpacking

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9907E2DE133DF937A25757C0A9649C8B63&pagewanted=all

 

MATTHEW KNEALE is a roller, not a folder. Mr. Kneale, the British novelist who wrote ''English Passengers,'' says he has traveled to 83 countries and all seven continents, and he's carried a lot of backpacks. His current bag, rigged with chicken wire and chains to foil slash-and-grab thieves, has just enough space for Mr. Kneale's two or three cameras and several days' worth of carefully packed clothing. ''I find clothes stay in a much better state if they're not folded but tightly rolled up,'' he wrote via e-mail from Tuscany.

Loading the bag is a less precise art. ''Try to imagine what you'll need access to regularly and what you hardly use,'' says Mr. Kneale, ''though however much you try you'll probably end up in the hotel where the power has failed rummaging for the flashlight thing that's stuck right at the bottom.''

Backpacking is meant to be liberating. With your possessions on your back, you can leave cities and cars behind, or simply have your hands free to hold a latte. Yet a poorly fitting or overloaded bag can make a backpacking excursion feel more like a forced march. To enjoy backpacking, you need to follow three principles: choose the correct bag, keep the load light and distribute the weight properly.

Buying the Right Bag

Choose a backpack the way you'd choose a very expensive pair of shoes. You need something that fits perfectly, remains comfortable after hours and weeks of wear, and is appropriate to the occasion. Just as you wouldn't buy plastic sandals for a formal dinner, you shouldn't choose a cheap nylon sack for a monthlong trek through the Lake District of England.

Proper fit should be your first consideration. Most packs have adjustable straps, but if the bag itself is too long or short, no amount of fine-tuning will make it comfortable. ''If you're buying a trekking pack, I'd actually recommend you go to a store and get your torso measured,'' said Jonathan Dorn, executive editor of Backpacker magazine. (You can measure your torso at home by running a tape measure from the large seventh vertebra at the base of your neck to the point on your spine between the tops of your hips.) For comfort, the distance between your pack's shoulder straps and hip belt should be roughly equal to the length of your torso.

Size and design are also important. Backpack capacity is measured in cubic inches or liters; daypacks are usually 2,000 cubic inches (33 liters) or less, while a touring pack of 4,500 to 6,000 cubic inches (75 to 100 liters) can hold enough gear for a month or more. An internal frame is more stable for heavy loads, while an external frame lets air circulate between your back and the pack, a valuable feature for hot climates. You can cram more into a top-loading pack, but a pack with zippered flaps or compartments will allow easier access to your possessions.

Once you've found the right size and design, check for comfort and adjustability. Every backpack feels fine when empty, so stuff potential purchases with clothing and gear before trying them on. Beltlike compression straps, featured on most backpacks, stabilize smaller loads and keep the bag close to your back.

Frequent shifts in weight are also crucial to comfort, so look for a bag with ''load lifters,'' straps that adjust the balance between shoulder and hip. Straps should fit comfortably from collarbone to shoulder blade, and the hip belt should be snug and well padded. Walk around the store, swing your arms and turn your head to ensure that straps don't chafe or pinch. ''Don't get seduced by looks, because comfort is what will keep you wearing and enjoying the pack,'' Mr. Dorn said.

What to Take

The traveler's adage -- estimate what you'll need, then pack half the clothes and twice the money -- is particularly applicable to backpackers, whose fatigue and risk of injury increase with every excess pound. Traveling light means packing only essentials, buying clothes as you go, disposing of useless items, and taking clothes that have more than one purpose. Consider convertible pants that zip off at the knee, swimming trunks that double as shorts, sarongs that serve as skirts, towels, beach blankets and wraps. Quick-drying fabrics are also a boon to the backpacker.

When 24-year-old Mark Hulett left Toronto for a five-month odyssey through Southeast Asia, Australia and New Zealand, his backpack contained everything from long johns to swim suits. Reached in New Zealand four months into the trip, Mr. Hulett reported that he had sent home his long johns, fleece track suit and woolly hat from Nepal and had given away his running shoes in Laos. If he could do it again, he would take less and buy more. ''I could have easily put together a few outfit combinations in Thailand or India or Nepal at a very low cost,'' Mr. Hulett wrote via e-mail.

There are some things no backpacker should be without: laminated copies of passports, plane tickets and contact numbers; a flashlight, a first-aid kit, a water bottle, wool socks, good walking shoes, and a lock to protect the pack and its contents. Beyond that, consider everything optional. ''The lighter you pack, the faster you can travel, the more you can see,'' Mr. Dorn said.

Wrinkles No Matter What

Backpackers divide into two camps: rollers versus folders. ''Clothes were never meant to be rolled,'' Mr. Hulett writes. ''I figure if I take my time folding, it is going to get packed just as tightly as if by rolling.'' Mr. Kneale disagrees. ''I find clothes stay in a much better state if they're not folded but tightly rolled up,'' he writes. Wrinkles are inevitable either way, but rollers might have the edge. You can put elastic bands around rolled T-shirts to compress them further, while items prone to wrinkles can be rolled together and slipped into bags.

Whether rolling or folding, store clothes, toiletries and supplies in separate nylon pouches, so you don't have to unload the whole bag to find what you need. Pouches also facilitate the final step in comfortable backpacking: proper distribution of weight.

In a recent ergonomic study, engineers at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, created a backpacking simulator in which human-size mannequins were equipped with both packs and sensors. As the mannequins ''walked,'' the sensors recorded the pressures and forces on both body and bag. The researchers discovered that muscle strain was reduced when heavy items were positioned near the top, rather than at the bottom of the pack.

For travelers seeking spontaneity and adventure, no mere suitcase or duffel bag can compete with the backpack. But no matter which backpack you choose, how little you take or how well you pack, gravity will catch up with you eventually.

''They're always too heavy -- even when they're light,'' Mr. Kneale said. Then again, taking off the pack, bragging about sore muscles and having everything you need at your fingertips may be an essential part of traveling as a backpacker.

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Kickstarting the the New Year

I hope everyone enjoyed the holidays. Just got back from Toronto. But thats another discussion.

As you may know im addicted to helping others. One of my favorite digital drugs of choice is Kickstarter.com Im starting the year off with a bang by backing a few projects.

 

Meg Lanson and I have at least two things in common. We both are aspiring filmmakers and a dire love for film. The second is that we are both engulfed in the 11:11 phenomenon. But what sets her apart is that Ms. Lanson is planning to make a feature film in which 11:11 is involved. This is a script she's been working on since 2002. After sending her a few messages I sense her excitement for the project.

 

I'm a huge hip hop fan. Not like Soulja Boy or bullshit like that. More Like Rakim, Nas, Kool G Rap, Ice Cube, Mr. Shakur, Mr. Wallace, etc..Anyways...This is an interesting project by Tahir Hemphill. The Hip-Hop Word Count (HHWC) is a searchable database of lyrics from over 40,000 Hip-Hop songs from 1979 to the present. It has some interesting features that make it a gold mine for analyzing trends in word usage and more.

 

I believe Felix Häusler and Leo Fasbender could revolutionize journalism with this project called Newsgrape. I'll let them explain. And they can do it in multiple languages if you ask them.

 

I love guitars, especially unique ones like this. Its called a Roto-uku. It has a unique sound and 8 strings, one which could possibly be played with your thumb.

 

Filmmaker Colin Levy, which you maybe familar with for directing the open source project film called Sintel is making an amazing psychological drama short film called The Secret Number.

 

Are familar with the Colored Hockey League? It was a neglected part of sports history that we and the current National Hockey League must recognize. Arvay Adams is making merchandise to bring awareness.

 

Last but certainly not least, and may actually be one of the more important films I have supported is HABIBI. HABIBI, directed by Susan Youssef , will be the first feature film set in Gaza in 15 years. I am a major advocate for Palestine's freedom politically or socially or through art and expression. Ive told her multiple times how im a fan of hers and how proud I am of her for takiing such a large step by taking on such project that had (and still may have) lots of barriers to overcome. Susan, your my habibi. Shukran.

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous

Transcript: Bill Moyers Interviews Karen Armstrong

http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_armstrong.html

 

BILL MOYERS: She was a spark plug in my PBS series on Genesis, her books are best sellers, "The History of God", "The Battle for God", "Jerusalem". She's written a biography of Buddha, and a short history of Islam. Soon we'll have her new memoir of her life after the convent where she spent seven years as a nun. Joining me now is one of the world's foremost students of religion, Karen Armstrong. Thank you.

 

KAREN ARMSTRONG: Thank you Bill.

BILL MOYERS: If you were God, would you do away with religion?

ARMSTRONG: Well, there are some forms of religion that must make God weep. There are some forms of religion that are bad, just as there's bad cooking or bad art or bad sex, you have bad religion too. Religion that has concentrated on egotism, that's concentrated on belligerence rather than compassion.

MOYERS: And so much of religion has been the experience of atrocity.

ARMSTRONG: But then you have to remember that this is what human beings do. Secularism has shown that it can be just as murderous, just as lethal, uh, as religion. Now I think one of the reasons why religion developed in the way that it did over the centuries was precisely to curb this murderous bent that we have as human beings.

MOYERS: You get September 11th ... you get the Crusades, you get ... do you remember the young Orthodox Jew who assassinated Itzhak Rabin? I can see him right now, looking into the camera, and he says, everything I did, I did for ...

ARMSTRONG: For God.

MOYERS: ... for the glory of God.

ARMSTRONG: Yes. Yes. Well, this is ... this is bad religion. Compassion is not a popular virtue. Very often when I talk to religious people, and mention how important it is that compassion is the key, that it's the sine-qua-non of religion, people look kind of balked, and stubborn sometimes, as much to say, what's the point of having religion if you can't disapprove of other people? And sometimes we use religion just to back up these unworthy hatreds, because we're frightened too.

MOYERS: Fear?

ARMSTRONG: There's great fear. We fear that if we're not in control, other people will cut us down to size, and so we hit out first.

From the beginning, violence was associated with religion, but the advanced religions, and I'm talking about Buddhism, Hinduism, monotheism, the Hebrew prophets, they insisted that you must transcend this violence, you must not give in to this violence, but you must learn to recognize that every single other human being is sacred.

 

MOYERS: That's what we're taught when ... growing up, you know, Jesus loves the little children. All the children of the world, red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world. But as soon as they grow up, they go for each other's throats.

ARMSTRONG: Yes. And a lot of this talk about love and compassion can be on the rather sloppy level. Or rather easy, facile level, where compassion is hard. It's nothing to do with feeling. It's about feeling with others. Learning to put yourself in the position of another person. There were years in my life when I was eaten up with misery and anger, I was sick of religion but when I got to understand what religion was really about, uh, not about dogmas, not about propping up the church, not about converting other people to your particular wavelength, but about getting rid of ego and approaching others in reverence, I became much happier.

But you have to go a long journey, a journey that takes you away from selfishness, from greed. And that leads you to value the sacredness in all others. I'm thinking of Abraham in Genesis — there's a wonderful story, where Abraham is sitting outside his tent and it's the hottest part of a Middle Eastern afternoon, and he sees three strangers on the horizon.

And now most of us would never dream of bringing a total stranger from the streets into our own homes, strangers are potentially lethal people. But that's exactly what Abraham does. He runs out, he bows down before them, as though they were kings, and brings them into his encampment, and makes his wife prepare an elaborate meal. And in the course of the ensuing conversation, it transpires quite naturally that one of those strangers is Abraham's God, that the act of practical compassion led to a divine encounter.

In Hebrew, the word for holy, kadosh, means separate, other. And sometimes it's the very otherness of a stranger, someone who doesn't belong to our ethnic or ideological or religious group, an otherness that can repel us initially, but which can jerk us out of our habitual selfishness, and give us intonations of that sacred otherness, which is God.

MOYERS: What happened in your case? You said that you came to this insight that you weren't a good person.

ARMSTRONG: After I left the convent, for 15 years I was worn out with religion, I wanted nothing whatever to do with it. I felt disgusted with it. If I saw someone reading a religious book on a train, I'd think, how awful.

I had no job at all, and I was asked to do a television series on Saint Paul, and I was working with an Israeli film company ...I went to Jerusalem. And there, very importantly, I encountered Judaism and Islam. And up until that point, my religious life had been very parochial, been very Catholic, and I'd never thought of Judaism as anything but the kind of prelude to Christianity, and I'd never thought about Islam at all. But in Jerusalem, where you see these three religions jostling together, often very uneasily, even violently, you become aware of the profound connections between them and it was the study of these other faiths that led me back to an appreciation of what religion was trying to do.

MOYERS: What appealed to you about Islam? Because in the context of 9/11 ... there's so much talk about Islam as a violent religion. We saw those suicide bombers, heard those suicide bombers invoking the name of Allah, saying they were doing this in the name of ... of God, and the name of their own faith. So you're saying, there are good things about this religion, that helped you rediscover your own spiritual journey.

ARMSTRONG: Ironically, the first thing that appealed to me about Islam was its pluralism. The fact that the Koran praises all the great prophets of the past. That Mohammed didn't believe he had come to found a new religion to which everybody had to convert, but he was just the prophet sent to the Arabs, who hadn't had a prophet before, and left out of the divine plan. There's a story where Mohammed makes a sacred flight from Mecca to Jerusalem, to the Temple Mount. And there he is greeted by all the great prophets of the past. And he ascends to the divine throne, speaking to the prophets like Jesus and Aaron, Moses, he takes advice from Moses, and finally encounters Abraham at the threshold of the divine sphere. This story of the flight of Mohammed and the ascent to the divine throne is the paradigm, the archetype of Muslim spirituality. It reflects the ascent that every Muslim must make to God and the Sufis, when I started talking ...

MOYERS: The mystical sect.

ARMSTRONG: The mystical branch of Islam, the Sufi movement, insisted that when you had encountered God, you were neither a Jew, a Christian, a Muslim. You were at home equally in a synagogue, a mosque, a temple or a church, because all rightly guided religion comes from God, and a man of God, once he's glimpsed the divine, has left these man-made distinctions behind.

MOYERS: How do you explain the hatred in the world of Islam toward the west, toward America in particular?

ARMSTRONG: Well, uh, all fundamentalist movements, that's whether they're Jewish, Christian or Muslim or Buddhist, all begin as an intra-religious debate, an intra-religious struggle.

Then, at a later stage, fundamentalists sometimes reach out towards a foreign foe and hence the Muslim feeling that American foreign policy is ... is holding them back.

MOYERS: Why do they think American foreign policy is the root of their ills?

ARMSTRONG: This was very much an Arab feeling. They feel that they are fighting a holy war ... that America fights Muslims, has killed Muslims, in Iraq, that America is still continuing to bomb Iraq ...

MOYERS: And yet in Bosnia, we went to the defense of Muslims there.

ARMSTRONG: Exactly, exactly. There's a running sore of the Arab-Israeli conflict, which has been festering for so long, and has become symbolic of everything that Muslims feel that is wrong with the modern world. Just as here, in the United States, fundamentalists have symbolic issues, abortion, uh, and evolution, which they can't see rationally, but they've become symbolic of ... of the evils of modernity. The state of Israel, which meant that Palestinians lost their home, has become for Muslims a symbol of their impotence in the modern world.

It wasn't always like this. At the beginning of the twentieth century, every single leading Muslim intellectual was in love with the west, and wanted their countries to look just like Britain and France. Some of them even said that the Europeans, they didn't know about America yet, that the Europeans, uh, were better Muslims than they themselves, because their modern society had enabled them to create a fairer and more just distribution of wealth, than was possible in their pre-modern climates, and that accorded more perfectly with the vision of the Quran.

Then there was the experience of colonialism under Britain and France, experiences like Suez, the Iranian revolution, Israel, and some people, not all by any means, uh, some people have allowed this ... these series of disasters to corrode into hatred. Islam is a religion of success. Unlike Christianity, which has as its main image, in the west at least, a man dying in a devastating, disgraceful, helpless death.

MOYERS: On a cross, crucified.

ARMSTRONG: The cross, crucified, and that turned into victory. Mohammed was not an apparent failure. He was a dazzling success, politically as well as spiritually, and Islam went from strength to strength to strength. But against the West, it's been able to make no headway, and this is as disturbing for Muslims as the discoveries of Darwin have been to some Christians. The Quran says that if you live according to the Quranic ideal, implementing justice in your society, then your society will prosper, because this is the way human beings are supposed to live. But whatever they do, they cannot seem to get Muslim history back on track, and this has led some, and only a minority, it must be said, to desperate conclusions.

MOYERS: You said once that you felt the fundamentalists were trying to restore God to the world.

ARMSTRONG: Yes, all fundamentalists feel that in a secular society, God has been relegated to the margin, to the periphery and they are all in different ways seeking to drag him out of that peripheral position, back to center stage.

MOYERS: They drag God back into the political world by denying democratic aspirations.

ARMSTRONG: Yes.

MOYERS: I mean, do you think democracy and fundamentalism are, uh, can co-exist?

ARMSTRONG:Fundamentalists are not friends of democracy. And that includes your fundamentalists in the United States.

Every fundamentalist movement I've studied in Judaism, Christianity and Islam is convinced at some gut, visceral level that secular liberal society wants to wipe out religion. Wants to wipe them out. Jewish fundamentalism, for example, came into being ... came really to the fore in a new way after the Nazi Holocaust ...

And some fundamentalists in the Muslim world have experienced secularism, not as we have, as a liberating process, but so rapid and accelerated that it's often been an assault.The Shahs of Iran used to have their soldiers go out with their bayonets out, taking the womens' veils off, and ripping them to pieces in front of them, because they wanted their society to look modern, never mind the fact that the vast majority of the people had not had a western education, and didn't know what was going on. On one occasion in 1935, Shah Reza Pahlevi, gave his soldiers orders to shoot at hundreds of unarmed demonstrators in one of the holiest shrines of Iran, who were peacefully protesting against western dress, uh, obligatory western dress, and hundreds of Iranians died that day. Now, in a climate like this, secularism is not experienced as something benign, it's experienced as a deadly assault.

MOYERS: When fundamentalism experienced its rebirth in this country, a quarter of a century ago, political rebirth, it was because the federal government, the Internal Revenue Service, had, uh, denied their parochial religious schools tax-exempt status ...

ARMSTRONG: Yes.

MOYERS: ... if they segregated.

ARMSTRONG: That's right.

MOYERS: And the fundamentalists became alarmed at that, and fearing that they were going to be annihilated.

ARMSTRONG: Exactly so. And similarly, in the famous Scopes Trial, which I think tells us a lot about the fundamentalist process in 1925, you'll remember, fundamentalists tried to ban the teaching of evolution in the public schools, and there was a celebrated trial, in which the fundamentalists were really ridiculed in the secular press. After the Scopes Trial, after the ridicule, they swung to the extreme right, and there they've remained.

MOYERS: The inequality gap in this country is larger, I believe, than in any other industrial society.

ARMSTRONG: Yes.

MOYERS: What does that say about the most religious country in the world? And that's your definition. America's the most religious country in the world, and yet it's the most unequal economically.

ARMSTRONG: It's ... and this should trouble us all. It should trouble us all. Religious people should join hands, and fight for ... for greater equality. Try and see if you can introduce Christian, Jewish or true Muslims values into society. Not trying to force other people, but bringing to bear that respect for the sacred rights of others that all religions, at their best, three very important words, at their best, are trying to promote.

MOYERS: Where are you in your own journey? You're not a practicing Catholic, are you?

ARMSTRONG: No. I usually call myself these days a freelance monotheist. I draw nourishment from all three of the religions of Abraham, uh, I spend my life studying these faiths, in a sense I'm still a nun. I live alone, and I've never married, and I spend my life writing and talking and reading and studying spirituality and God. And I can not see in essence any one of these three faiths as superior to any of the others. I suppose one of my hopes in life is to try to get Jews, Christians and Muslims to realize the profound unanimity, the unanimous vision that they share, and to join hands together to stop the kind of cruelty, violence and obscenity, moral obscenity that we saw on September the 11th.

MOYERS:Thank you, Sister Karen.

ARMSTRONG: Thank you, Bill.

Posted via email from citizen-caine's posterous